我唾弃你的坟墓
不是第二个能杀死威信的“威信”。_我的网站
A | 无论是在模拟时代还是即将到来的5G时代，更快更好的网络速度都只是微不足道的数字。
Francesco Faiola
Editor's Note:Ahead of the opening of the 2026 World AI Conference and High-Level Meeting on Global AI Governance, Chinese AI start-up Moonshot AI released its Kimi K3 large language model. As the world's largest open-source model by parameter count to date, this launch marks a significant step forward in the development of China's artificial intelligence models.
From the C919 airliner soaring into the skies to Unitree's humanoid robots stealing the show; from DeepSeek pushing the AI frontier to Moonshot AI's landmark unveiling of Kimi K3 - China's wave of homegrown innovations has dominated global headlines in recent years, delivering a steady stream of breakthroughs.
At a meeting in Beijing that brought together the national science and technology award conference, the general assemblies of the members of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and the Chinese Academy of Engineering (CAE), and the 11th national congress of the China Association for Science and Technology in July, Chinese President Xi Jinping, also general secretary of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee and chairman of the Central Military Commission, stressed that the 15th Five-Year Plan period (2026-2030) is a critical phase for tackling tough challenges in building up the country's strength in science and technology.
"We must seize the historic opportunity, rise to the challenges of the times, accelerate efforts to achieve high-level self-reliance and strength in science and technology, and make steady progress toward the 2035 goal of becoming a leading country in science and technology," he said.
In the article "Strive for Greater Strength and Self-Reliance in Science and Technology" included in the fourth volume of
Xi Jinping: The Governance of China, Xi pointed out, "Through years of endeavor, our country's overall strength in science and technology has improved substantially. We therefore have a solid foundation, and are fully confident in our ability to seize the opportunities offered by the new revolution in science, technology and industry to achieve greater results." The article also mentioned that "We should participate to the full in global science and technology governance, contribute Chinese wisdom, and shape a philosophy of technology for good purposes, so that science and technology better serve human wellbeing, and enable China's science and technology industry to contribute more to building a global community of shared future."
In the 27th installment of the special series "Decoding the
Book Xi Jinping: The Governance of China," the Global Times, along with the People's Daily Overseas Edition, continues to invite Chinese and foreign scholars, translators of Xi's works, practitioners with firsthand experience, and international readers to focus on the theme of striving for greater strength and self-reliance in science and technology. Together, they share views on China's tech growth, governance principles, and global cooperation in science and technology.
In the 27th article of the "Readers' Reflections" column, Global Times (GT) talked to Francesco Faiola (Faiola), an Italian professor at the Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences with Chinese Academy of Sciences and recipient of the Chinese Government Friendship Award.
GT: Chinese President Xi Jinping delivered a keynote speech at the opening ceremony of the 2026 World AI Conference and High-Level Meeting on Global AI Governance on July 17. He said that as a responsible major country, China is always committed to providing international public goods relating to AI. In the article "Boost Basic Research and Achieve Greater Strength and Self-Reliance in Science and Technology" included in the fifth volume of Xi Jinping: The Governance of China, Xi said, "It is important that we adopt a more open-minded approach to international exchange and cooperation in research to create an open, globally competitive innovation ecosystem." Amid the current complex global landscape, China remains firmly committed to keeping its doors open to international scientific collaboration. In your view, where does China's confidence in this commitment come from?Faiola: I think China's confidence in staying open comes from a deep shift in mindset. The Chinese people, especially the scientific community, now really believe they are not inferior to Westerners. For a long time, even many people here thought top science had to happen at a Western address. When I first came, I believed that too. The US and Europe seemed like the only serious places for breakthroughs. Now that idea is changing, and moving toward China, because the evidence of leadership is everywhere: stem cell standards, artificial intelligence (AI) efficiency, green manufacturing. It's undeniable. China knows it has everything needed to attract and keep international talent. It's no longer a developing country playing catch up. It's a place that's helping set the global agenda.
That self-assurance is the bedrock of openness. When you truly believe you have unique strengths, like a huge organoid screening capability or a community of scientists who think deeply, you don't fear open doors. You want colleagues from everywhere to walk through so the science moves faster. My own lab works with European centers as equals. That parity is real. But we also know not everyone abroad gets this transformation yet. A lot of people still imagine Chinese science as just following others. That's exactly why China is pushing openness harder: funding lines for foreign principal investigators, open innovation hubs in Beijing, active participation in setting international standards. These aren't defensive moves. They're proof of a country confident enough to invite the world in, show what it can do, and create knowledge together.
On a deeper level, the confidence is also just rational. The big challenges - environmental problem, pandemic preparedness and precision medicine - are global. If China closed itself off, the data and validation its own regulators need would get weaker. So, the open door isn't charity. It's the smart recognition that scientific greatness today gets multiplied when you share it.
GT: In the article "Strive for Greater Strength and Self-Reliance in Science and Technology" included in the fourth volume of Xi Jinping: The Governance of China, Xi pointed out, "Through years of endeavor, our country's overall strength in science and technology has improved substantially. We therefore have a solid foundation, and are fully confident in our ability to seize the opportunities offered by the new revolution in science, technology and industry to achieve greater results." From the domestically built large passenger jet to DeepSeek, Unitree Robotics, and Moonshot AI's Kimi K3, China's innovation achievements have been making headlines. How do you assess China's achievements in sci-tech innovation in recent years?
Faiola: I measure China's innovation success in a very personal way. My parents are old, living in a small Italian town. They don't speak English. They don't understand molecular biology. They can't read a scientific paper. But over the past few years, they've called me up more than once, excited, telling me about a Chinese airplane or a humanoid robot or some AI breakthrough they saw on Italy's main TV news or in the newspapers.
That tells me something deep. These aren't niche stories for tech insiders. They are real global news, landing in the living rooms of retirees who barely use a smartphone. I'm not bragging to them about China's progress. They are telling me. When achievements get that far into everyday European life, it's a sign China is doing something the world finds worth talking about.
The C919 plane, DeepSeek, Unitree Robotics - these aren't one-off hits. They prove China can now conceive, design, and build complex, original systems on its own, whether it's an airliner, an advanced AI model, or an agile robot. That takes deep integration across different fields, aerodynamics, materials, real time control, and AI.
DeepSeek's whole philosophy, doing more with less, is exactly how we created affordable organoid screening tools. And the quiet shift from rule taker to rule maker in chemical safety standards, that mirrors the C919's ambition to compete globally on certification. All this shows China is blending manufacturing, digital smarts, and biology into one force. But my real proof is what I hear from my students. They don't just apply discoveries from papers anymore. They question the assumptions behind them. That intellectual confidence, and the fact it echoes all the way back to a small Italian town, is why I'm sure China will fully seize this moment.
GT: President Xi said that AI development should not be a solo performance by a single country, but a symphony of international cooperation. Having conducted research in China for many years, you are not only a witness but also a driving force behind China-Europe scientific exchanges. Looking ahead, how can both sides deepen complementary advantages and achieve mutually beneficial empowerment to jointly address global challenges such as climate change and health? Over the next five years, which specific sectors should China-Europe science and technology collaboration prioritize?Faiola: I grew up in Italy and now I lead a lab in Beijing while working with colleagues all over Europe. So, China-Europe teamwork isn't some abstract idea to me. It's how my week actually looks. The old cliché, European basic research plus Chinese scale and speed, is already outdated. Both sides now generate novel insights. The relationship has to become genuine two-way cocreation.
I see three practical things that would deepen it. First, we need truly joint funding: one grant, one integrated team, maybe a Max Planck group and a Chinese Academy of Sciences group, with a single scientific plan and students who genuinely rotate between the labs. Second, we need to harmonize regulations and ethics for organoid technologies. Europe has advanced thinking on governance. China has manufacturing scale and the drive to get things into clinics. If we co-develop shared quality and ethical standards for organoid testing, we basically set the global benchmark. A liver organoid made in Europe could then be used directly for a toxicity screen in China without repeating all the validation. Third, we need deliberate talent circulation, not a zero-sum competition. Joint PhD programs where a student naturally moves between continents.
The science doesn't care about borders. If we build the shared tools now, China and Europe can show the world a model where shared knowledge beats division.
GT: Recently, some Western media and think tanks are peddling "China Shock 2.0," claiming that China is achieving fast development in high-tech sectors such as renewable energy and AI and relies on foreign markets to absorb its overcapacity, thus reducing the market share of developed countries and sending more serious shock waves to the global economy compared with the era of traditional manufacture industry. What's your comment on this? In your view, does this represent a new pretext for Western protectionism, or is it an unavoidable external misunderstanding amid China's industrial upgrading?
Faiola: I'm a bench scientist, not a political analyst. I stick to what I can see and measure in my own work. So, I'm not going to guess what the media or think tanks intend. I'll just tell you what the facts show me, and from my lab, the "China Shock 2.0" story just doesn't match up.
In my field of stem cell toxicology, the world is desperate for human relevant safety tests to replace animal testing. Tens of thousands of chemicals still don't have proper hazard data. When Chinese labs turn out high throughput organoid platforms at a fraction of the old cost, that's not dumping "overcapacity" into a full market. It's filling a huge shortage. A researcher in Brazil or Kenya suddenly gets access to a toxicity screen that never existed for them before. Demand is skyrocketing, not standing still. Meeting that demand is a service, not a shock.
With AI, it's the same pattern. DeepSeek's efficiency makes it cheaper and easier for biomedical researchers around the world to use these tools. It's helping create new markets, not stealing a fixed pie. Sure, any big shift causes some dislocation. The answer to that is domestic support and transition policies, not blocking technologies that help solve planetary problems.
。他们背后的真相是人类加速信息获取的愿望。
B | 因此，尽管智能手机的发展更为复杂，但其最基本的工作仍然是将我们与全世界紧密联系起来。也许正是因为这个原因，各种社会化的互联网服务将在当今移动互联网的快速发展中应运而生，并不断增加到社会互动的热点话题上。今天，有三个社会应用程序同时出现在我们眼前。它们是由字节跳跃发布的视频社交产品“多闪”，前创始人王欣发布的匿名社交产品“厕所mt”，科技一出现，罗永浩就发布的社交应用“聊天宝藏”。又一次尝试写信。那么这些应用程序能工作吗？厕所mt、厕所mt和超宝是第一批同时上线的产品。这是一个匿名的社会产品“厕所山”，由前厕所山创始人王鑫推出。
C | 虽然它于1月16日正式推出，但昨晚已经上市。“厕所mt”将匿名社交活动放在首位。用户和用户使用隐藏聊天模式，这类似于以前的应用程序，如secret。在“马桶山”中，人们可以放下过去社会地位的面具，实时地展现自己的真实情感。接下来是今天的头条新闻“字节跳跃”，这是一个用来定位亲密社会关系的短视频工具。与Tremolo和Fast Hand平台不同，Multi-Flash更像是微邮件的视频版本。朋友之间的交流和展示都是通过短视频共享完成的。官员们希望在没有压力和温度的情况下使之成为一种熟悉的社会产品。最后，由科技公司推出的老罗聊天宝藏，具有用户在社交和聊天过程中产生相应利润的最大特点，使用后系统将利润的价值返还给用户。
D | 这听起来和威信的短信模式没什么不同。事实上，罗永豪并不是第一次尝试即时通讯产品。如果你记得几个月前的子弹短信，你会发现他在这个领域没有取得很好的成绩。货架上的三个应用程序也引起了微信的关注。就在昨晚，“马桶山”上线仅一小时后，微信和腾讯金卡因黄色相关问题而被屏蔽。目前，厕所山的官方网站和淘宝一样，在微信中处于不可访问状态。该申请的创办人王鑫在个人微博和微博中对此表示愤慨。这不是社交软件第一次挑战微信，但没人能真正撼动腾讯。双刃剑，马桶山和聊天宝不是最早的微信挑战者。近年来，微信的挑战者层出不穷。
E | 然而，在即时通讯和熟人社交网络领域，很少有人能真正动摇微信的主导地位。不久前，张小龙团队在2019年微信开放课程专家现场正式发布了“2018年微信数据报告”，分享了大量当前微信用户数据。
F | 目前，微信和微信合并活跃账户10.82亿户，每天发送短信450亿条，比去年增长18%；音视频通话4.1亿条，比去年增长100%。在旅游、零售、餐饮和公共服务领域，2018年的月度付款数量与去年相比大幅增加。从社会到商业，微信已经渗透到我们生活的方方面面。同时，微信本身也探索了更多的细分市场和盈利模式。例如，这个小项目的第二个生日已经覆盖了200个子部门，服务于1000多亿用户，年交易量增加了600%以上，创造了5000亿的商业价值。回顾过去，微信的成功不是偶然的，而是有利环境和三方因素共同作用的结果。微信虽然不是最早的以移动平台为核心的即时通讯工具，但与竞争对手（michao）相比，微信更注重移动即时通讯体验。几乎每一个功能扩展步骤都在考虑社会使用的需要。
G | 以朋友圈为例。当时，微博的短内容占有率最高，但魏鑫抓住了“熟人社会化”的关键，封锁了朋友圈外微博广场的无用信息，成功打造了微博外新的共享平台。
H | 同时，在微信推出8年来，时代也经历了从3G网络到4G网络的步伐，这意味着移动互联网本身可以承载更多的体验，从文本共享到图像共享到视频共享，微信似乎也在以光速前进。根据中国互联网协会发布的《2018年中国互联网发展报告》中提到的数据，微信友谊圈已经成为中国最常用的社交应用，拥有87.3%的用户。人们不仅浏览周围的新事物，而且与周围的人保持社会关系——你的父母、亲戚、同事、同学都在那里。事实上，近年来，类似的社交工具如可信、子弹短信层出不穷，但它们只是昙花一现，偶尔发生爆炸，而且只有经过一次高温，光速才被遗忘。有趣的是，上面提到的凶手只是第二个“威信”。
I | 在中国用户已经形成用户粘性的时候，不可能击败威信成为第二个威信。
J | 因此，社会服务要想取得成功，就必须实现“曲线超车”。看着微信光环下能够成功崛起的社会服务，除了老微博依然活跃外，可以想象的自然是震颤、快速的手和陌生人。毫无疑问，这三个目标都是社交模式，而不是即时通讯。其中，Tremolo和Fast Hand享受了4G网络电价下调的红利。以威信最差的短视频共享为核心，推出了基于短视频的业务和用户使用模式。虽然对熟人的社交互动影响不大，但两个平台的内容创造和数量都超出了微信的范围；其次，陌生人打破了这一微小的差距。新认识的社会模式，主要称为“陌生的社会互动”，满足了普通用户对“新鲜感”的习得，也不足以满足新认识的需要。也许是震颤、快速的手和陌生人的成功，使得加倍、坐便器和聊天宝藏难以同时发送微信。毫无例外，他们都瞄准了微信的“软肋”，试图从侧面超越微信。而战栗也会在最近的网上熟人社交应用“战栗信”，我不知道这是否意味着另一个社交软件展即将到来。
K | 微信需要竞争对手。
L | 我们还需要更多的社交网络。微信的所有挑战者都需要了解这样一个事实：微信降低了社交网络和即时通讯的成本。软件本身需要在不遵循传统即时消息模式的情况下提供更好的通信体验。它的载体可以是视频或文本，以使用户为基础。有尝试的欲望。其次，无论是多闪速、马桶mt还是聊天宝，都需要提供绝对的吸引力，让用户忽略社交应用的迁移成本。毕竟，目前在微信和朋友之间，已经形成了一个非常坚实的社会和商业平台（如微企业和媒体），其他同类产品都无法提供，如何打破这种强大的关系，提供同样强大的平台？至少目前的产品都无法与之匹配。然而，我们仍然认为微信需要竞争对手，因为现代人的孤独和空虚永远不会被微信填满。
Current article:http://awz.shouyouxumianpouluanteng.shop/d3zg9/20260826/805.html
Published on:21:58:29
